2023-1

VSNiP

Problems of Contemporary Science and Practice. Vernadsky University

Вопросы современной науки и практики. Университет имени В.И. Вернадского

2541-853X 1990-9047

ФГБОУ ВО «Тамбовский государственный технический университет»

10.17277/voprosy.2023.01.pp.139-156

12374

Version of Record

The Eye-Tracking Study of the Efficiency of Video Lectures in Blended Learning Environment

Айтрекинговое исследование эффективности видеолекций при смешанном обучении

Titova

I. N.

Klepikov

O. E.

Peshkovskaya

A G.

eye tracking video lectures interviewing massive open online courses educational content online learning blended learning

айтрекинг видеолекции интервьюирование массовые открытые онлайн-курсы образовательный контент онлайн-обучение смешанное обучение

Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /usr/local/www/vernadsky/data/page/admin_article_edit.php on line 308

2023

1 квартал 2023 года

1 1

2023

, I. N. Titova, O. E. Klepikov, A G. Peshkovskaya

Приведены результаты айтрекингового исследования распро-страненных форматов видеолекций при смешанном обучении. Осуществлен их сравнительный анализ по уровню внимания и вовлеченности студентов; на основании запоминаемости учебного материала дано заключение об эффективности форматов. В частности, доказано, что продолжительность зрительного контакта студента с видеолекцией свидетельствует о лучшем восприятии и запоминаемости учебной информации, однако привлекать внимание студентов с помощью динамичного видеоряда и компьютерной анимации нецелесообразно из-за обратного эффекта. Интерпретация айтрекинговых данных осуществляется путем глубинного интервьюирования 20 студентов – участников исследования. Комбинация айтрекинга и интервьюирования позволила детектировать некоторые драйверы и барьеры, соответственно побуждающие и затрудняющие реализацию смешанного обучения. По итогам исследования сформулированы рекомендации для создания сбалансированного образовательного видеоконтента.

1. Rozanova N.M. [Flexible formats of training sessions: opportunities and limitations], Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and economy], 2020, no. 9, pp. 106-124. doi: 10.31857/S020736760011354-8 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)

2. Biktuganov Yu.I., Starichenko B.Ye., Starichenko Ye.B.; Galaguzova M.A. (Ed.). Sistema bazovykh terminov elektronnogo obucheniya [The system of basic terms of e- learning], Ponyatiynyy apparat pedagogiki i obrazovaniya: kollektivnaya monografiya [The conceptual apparatus of pedagogy and education: a collective monograph]. Blagoveshchensk, 2023, Is. 13, pp. 79-98. available at: https://www. elibrary.ru/ download/elibrary_49723523_76721017.pdf (accessed 02 March 2023). (In Russ.).

3. Bersin J. The Blended Learning Book: Best Practices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned, John Wiley & Sons, 2004. 328 p.

4. Mayer R.E., Moreno R. Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning, Educational Psychologist, 2003, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 43-52. doi: 10.1207/ S15326985EP3801_6

5. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The «What» and «Why» of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 2000, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227-268.

6. Branson R.K. Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development. Executive Summary and Model. Florida State Univ Tallahassee Center For Educational Technology, 1975. 188 p.

7. Hardré P., Miller R. Toward a Current, Comprehensive, Integrative, and Flexible Model of Motivation for Instructional Design, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2006, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 27-54.

8. Hahn L., Klein P. Eye Tracking in Physics Education Research: A Systematic Literature Review // Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2022, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-35. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.013102

9. Hachisuka S., Kurita K., Warisawa S. Confirmation of the Significance of Facial Images in Online Learning Using Eye Gaze Tracking Measurement, Proc. of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 595-599.

10. Tzi-Dong Ng J., Hu X., Que Y. Towards Multi-Modal Evaluation of Eye-Tracked Virtual Heritage Environment, LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 2022, pp. 451-457. doi: 10.1145/3506860.3506881

11. Ye L., Su H., Zhao J., Hang Y. The Impact of Multimedia Effect on Art Learning: Eye Movement Evidence from Traditional Chinese Pattern Learning, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 2021, vol. 40, no. 125, pp. 342-358. doi: 10.1111/jade.12347

12. Wang Y., Xu W., Zhan X., Liu Wenqi, Liu Wei, Cheng W. Research on Leamers 9 Eye Movements for Online Video Courses, 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2019, pp. 661-666. doi: 10.1109/ ICCSE.2019.8845375

13. Becker S., Obersteiner A., Dreher A. Eye Tracking-Promising Method for Analyzing Mathematics Teachers’ Assessment Competencies?, Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA’22). 2022, pp. 1-4. doi:10.1145/3517031.3529244

14. Kaminskiene L., Horlenko K., Chu L. Y. Applying Eye-Tracking Technology in the Field of Entrepreneurship Education, Artificiality and Sustainability in Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 163-187. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-11371-0_8

15. Sharma K., Dillenbourg P., Giannakos M. Stimuli-Based Gaze Analytics to Enhance Motivation and Learning in MOOCs, IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2019, vol. 2161, pp. 199-203. doi: 10.1109/ ICALT.2019.00052

16. Sharma K., Giannakos M., Dillenbourg P. Eye-Tracking and Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Motivation and Learning, Smart Learning Environments, 2020, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-19. doi: 10.1186/s40561-020-00122-x

17. Srivastava N., Nawaz S., Newn J., Lodge J.M., Velloso E., Erfani S.M., Gasevic D., Bailey J.C. Are You with Me? Measurement of Learners’ Video-Watching Attention with Eye Tracking, LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 2021, pp. 88-98. doi: 10.1145/3448139.3448148

18. Deubel H., Schneider W. Saccade Target Selection and Object Recognition: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism, Vision Research, 1996, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1827-1837. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4

19. Just A., Carpenter P.A. A Theory of Reading: from Eye Fixations to Comprehension, Psychological Review, 1980, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 329-354. doi:

10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329

20. Salthouse A., Ellis C. Determinants of Eye-Fixation Duration, The American Journal of Psychology, 1980, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 207-234.

21. Zhao Y., Lofi C., Hauff C. Scalable Mind-Wandering Detection for MOOCs: A Webcam-Based Approach, European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Springer, Cham, 2017. pp. 330-344. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_24

1. Розанова, Н. М. Гибкие форматы учебных занятий: возможности и огра- ничения / Н. М. Розанова // Общество и экономика. – 2020. – № 9. – С. 106 – 124. doi: 10.31857/S020736760011354-8

2. Биктуганов, Ю. И. Система базовых терминов электронного обучения. – Текст электрон. / Ю. И. Биктуганов, Б. Е. Стариченко, Е. Б. Стариченко ; отв. ред. М. А. Галагузова // Понятийный аппарат педагогики и образования : коллективная монография. – Благовещенск, 2023. – Вып. 13. – С. 79 – 98. – URL : https://www. elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_49723523_76721017.pdf (дата обращения : 02.03.2023).

3. Bersin, J. The Blended Learning Book: Best Practices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned / J. Bersin. – John Wiley & Sons, 2004. – 328 p.

4. Mayer, R. E. Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning / R. E. Mayer, R. Moreno // Educational Psychologist. – 2003. – Vol. 38, No. 1. – P. 43 – 52. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6

5. Deci, E. L. The «What» and «Why» of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior / E. L. Deci, R. M. Ryan // Psychological Inquiry. – 2000. – Vol. 11, No. 4. – P. 227 – 268.

6. Branson R. K. Interservice Procedures for Instructional Systems Development. Executive Summary and Model / R. K. Branson. – Florida State Univ Tallahassee Center For Educational Technology, 1975. – 188 p.

7. Hardré, P. Toward a Current, Comprehensive, Integrative, and Flexible Model of Motivation for Instructional Design / P. Hardré, R. Miller // Performance Improvement Quarterly. – 2006. – Vol. 19, No. 3. – P. 27 – 54.

8. Hahn, L. Eye Tracking in Physics Education Research: A Systematic Literature Review / L. Hahn, P. Klein // Physical Review Physics Education Research. – 2022. – Vol. 18, No. 1. – P. 1 – 35. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.013102

9. Hachisuka, S. Confirmation of the Significance of Facial Images in Online Learning Using Eye Gaze Tracking Measurement / S. Hachisuka, K. Kurita, S. Warisawa // Proc. of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). – Springer, Cham, 2021. – P. 595 – 599.

10. Tzi-Dong Ng J. Towards Multi-Modal Evaluation of Eye-Tracked Virtual Heritage Environment / J. Tzi-Dong Ng, X. Hu, Y. Que // LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. – 2022. – P. 451 – 457. doi: 10.1145/

3506860.3506881

11. The Impact of Multimedia Effect on Art Learning: Eye Movement Evidence from Traditional Chinese Pattern Learning / L. Ye [et al.] // International Journal of Art & Design Education. – 2021. – Vol. 40, No. 125. – P. 342 – 358. doi: 10.1111/jade.12347

12. Research on Leamers 9 Eye Movements for Online Video Courses / Y. Wang, W. Xu [et al.] // 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE). – 2019. – P. 661 – 666. doi: 10.1109/ICCSE.2019.8845375

13. Becker, S. Eye Tracking-Promising Method for Analyzing Mathematics Teachers’ Assessment Competencies? / S. Becker, A. Obersteiner, A. Dreher // Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA’22). – 2022. – P. 1 – 4. doi:10.1145/3517031.3529244

14. Kaminskiene, L. Applying Eye-Tracking Technology in the Field of Entrepreneurship Education / L. Kaminskiene, K. Horlenko, L. Y. Chu // Artificiality and Sustainability in Entrepreneurship. – Springer, Cham, 2022. – P. 163 – 187. doi:

10.1007/978-3-031-11371-0_8

15. Sharma, K. Stimuli-Based Gaze Analytics to Enhance Motivation and Learning in MOOCs / K. Sharma, P. Dillenbourg, M. Giannakos // IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2019. – Vol. 2161. – P. 199 – 203. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2019.00052

16. Sharma, K. Eye-Tracking and Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Motivation and Learning / K. Sharma, M. Giannakos, P. Dillenbourg // Smart Learning Environments. – 2020. – Vol. 7, No. 1. – P. 1 – 19. doi: 10.1186/s40561-020-00122-x

17. Are You with Me? Measurement of Learners’ Video-Watching Attention with Eye Tracking / N. Srivastava [et al.] // LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. – 2021. – P. 88 – 98. doi: 10.1145/3448139.3448148

18. Deubel, H. Saccade Target Selection and Object Recognition: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism / H. Deubel, W. Schneider // Vision Research. – 1996. – Vol. 36, No. 12. – P. 1827 – 1837. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4

19. Just, A. A Theory of Reading: from Eye Fixations to Comprehension / A. Just, P. A. Carpenter // Psychological Review. – 1980. – Vol. 87, No. 4. – P. 329 – 354. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329

20. Salthouse, A. Determinants of Eye-Fixation Duration / A. Salthouse, C. Ellis // The American Journal of Psychology. – 1980. – Vol. 93, No. 2. – P. 207 – 234.

21. Zhao, Y. Scalable Mind-Wandering Detection for MOOCs: A Webcam-Based Approach / Y. Zhao, C. Lofi, C. Hauff // European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. – Springer, Cham, 2017. – P. 330 – 344. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319- 66610-5_24